编辑推荐

  

  在中国现代化的进程中,西方哲学社会科学始终是最重要的思想资源。然而,一个令人遗憾的事实是,自19世纪末20世纪初“西学东渐”起,国人对于西学的了解,基本上是凭借零星的翻译和介绍,认真地去读原著的人少之又少。这些中译本,囿于译者的眼光和水平,往往与原著出入颇大。因此,国人谈论西学的情景,很像是瞎子摸象,虽然各执一词,却皆不得要领。
  当然,100年间,还是出现了一批学贯中西的学者,但其中肯花工夫于译业的太少。许多年积累下来,我们在这个领域拥有的优质中译本依然十分有限。而且,再好的译本,毕竟与原著隔了一层。倘若我们的学术界始终主要依靠中译本去了解和研究西学,我们的西学水平就永远不能摆脱可怜的境况。
  好在现在有了改变这种境况的条件。在当今全球化时代,随着国门进一步开放,中外交流日渐增多,人们普遍重视英语学习,国人中尤其年轻人中具备阅读英文原著能力的人越来越多了。在这种形势下,本丛书应运而生。编辑者的计划是,选择西方哲学、人文学科、社会科学领域的最基本的英文经典原著,分批陆续出版,为有志者提供价廉的版本和阅读的便利。我赞赏这样的善举,并且相信,这也是为学术界做的一件益事。
  周国平
  2010年2月24日

内容简介

  《世界名著典藏系列:纯粹理性批判(英文全本)》是康德三大批判著作、也是其全部哲学著述中意义最为特殊和重大的巨著,《世界名著典藏系列:纯粹理性批判(英文全本)》改变了整个西方哲学前进发展的方向和进程。康德花了11年的时间完成,1781年初版,1787年再版。贯彻始终的根本指导思想就是:通过对理性本身、即人类先天认识能力的批判考察,从而确定它能认识什么和不能认识什么,在这基础上对形而上学的命运和前途作出最终的判决和规定,其使命是为真正的、作为科学的形而上学提供坚实可靠的基础。

精彩书评

  ★倘若我们的学术界始终主要依靠中译本去了解和研究西学、我们的西学水平就永远不能摆脱可怜的境况。本丛书选择西方哲学、人文学科、社会科学领域的最基本的英文经典原著,分批陆续出版,我赞赏这样的善举,并且相信,这也是为学术做的一件益事。
  ——周国平

目录

1INTRODUCTION.
1.1I.OfthedifferencebetweenPureandEmpiricalKnowledge
1.2II.TheHumanIntellect,eveninanUnphilosophicalState,isinPossessionofCertainCognitions"apriori".
1.3III.PhilosophystandsinneedofaSciencewhichshallDeterminethePossibility,Principles,andExtentofHumanKnowledge"apriori"
1.4IV.OftheDifferenceBetweenAnalyticalandSyntheticalJudge-ments
1.5V.InallTheoreticalSciencesofReason,SyntheticalJudgements"apriori"arecontainedasPrinciples
1.6VI.TheUniversalProblemofPureReason
1.7VII.IdeaandDivisionofaParticularScience,undertheNameofaCritiqueofPureReason

2TRANSCENDENTALDOCTRINEOFELEMENTS.
2.1FIRSTPART.TRANSCENDENTALAESTHETIC
SECTIONI.OfSpace
SECTIONII.OfTime
2.2SECONDPART.TRANSCENDENTALLOGIC
INTRODUCTION.IdeaofaTranscendentalLogic
I.OfLogicinGeneral
II.OfTranscendentalLogic
III.OftheDivisionofGeneralLogicintoAnalyticandDialectic
IV.OftheDivisionofTranscendentalLogicintoTranscendentalAnalyticandDialectic.
TRANSCENDENTALLOGIC.FIRSTDIVISION
BOOKI
CHAPTERI.OftheTranscendentalCluetotheDiscoveryofallPureConceptionsoftheUnderstanding.
CHAPTERIIOftheDeductionofthePureConceptionsoftheUnderstanding
BOOKII.AnalyticofPrinciples
CHAPTERI.OftheSchematismatofthePureConceptionsoftheUnderstanding
CHAPTERII.SystemofallPrinciplesofthePureUnderstanding
CHAPTERIII.OftheGroundoftheDivisionofallObjectsintoPhenomenaandNoumena
TRANSCENDENTALLOGIC.SECONDDIVISION
TRANSCENDENTALDIALECTIC.INTRODUCTION
I.OfTranscendentalIllusoryAppearance.
II.OfPureReasonastheSeatofTranscendentalIllusoryAppearance
BOOKI.OFTHECONCEPTIONSOFPUREREASON
SECTIONIOfIdeasinGeneral
SECTIONII.OfTranscendentalIdeas
SECTIONIII.SystemofTranscendentalIdeas.
BOOKII.OFTHEDIALECTICALPROCEDUREOFPUREREASON
CHAPTERI.OftheParalogismsofPureReason
CHAPTERII.TheAntinomyofPureReason.
CHAPTERIII.TheIdealofPureReason.

3TRANSCENDENTALDOCTRINEOFMETHOD.
3.1CHAPTERI.TheDisciplineofPureReason
3.1.1SECTIONI.TheDisciplineofPureReasonintheSphereofDogmatism
3.1.2SECTIONII.TheDisciplineofPureReasoninPolemics
3.1.3SECTIONIII.TheDisciplineofPureReasoninHypothesis
3.1.4SECTIONIV.TheDisciplineofPureReasoninRelationtoProofs
3.2CHAPTERII.TheCanonofPureReason
3.2.1SECTIONI.OftheUltimateEndofthePureUseofReason
3.2.2SECTIONII.OftheIdealoftheSummumBonumasaDeterminingGroundoftheUltimateEndofPureReason
3.2.3SECTIONIII.OfOpinion,Knowledge,andBelief
3.3CHAPTERIII.TheArchitectonicofPureReason
3.4CHAPTERIV.TheHistoryofPureReason

精彩书摘

  Butasinalltheattemptshithertomadetoanswerthequestionswhichreasonispromptedbyitsverynaturetoproposetoitself,forexample,whethertheworldhadabeginning,orhasexistedfrometernity,ithasalwaysmetwithunavoidablecontradictions,wemustnotrestsatisfiedwiththemerenaturaldispositionofthemindtometaphysics,thatis,withtheexistenceofthefacultyofpurereason,whence,indeed,somesortofmetaphysicalsystemalwaysarises;butitmustbepossibletoarriveatcertaintyinregardtothequestionwhetherweknowordonotknowthethingsofwhichmetaphysicstreats.Wemustbeabletoarriveatadecisiononthesubjectsofitsquestions,orontheabilityorinabilityofreasontoformanyjudgementrespectingthem;andthereforeeithertoextendwithconfidencetheboundsofourpurereason,ortosetstrictlydefinedandsafelimitstoitsaction.Thislastquestion,whicharisesoutoftheaboveuniversalproblem,wouldproperlyrunthus:"Howismetaphysicspossibleasascience?"
  Thus,thecritiqueofreasonleadsatlast,naturallyandnecessarily,toscience;and,ontheotherhand,thedogmaticaluseofreasonwithoutcriticismleadstogroundlessassertions,againstwhichothersequallyspeciouscanalwaysbeset,thusendingunavoidablyinscepticism.

  ……


其他推荐